https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/
Kimmo Huosionmaa
So here is the time for some conspiracy stuff, and I decided to make this writing about the "second civil war in the USA". The civil war of the USA in 1861 to 1865 cost over 300 000 casualties and that war was one of the bloodiest in the history of that nation. Today we are concerning the freedom and our privacy, and we have almost forgotten one quite interesting idea of the civil war. When the Union won the war in 1860's there were claiming, that the Southern side of Confederate would try to make relevance in sometimes after the civil war.
And here is the very interesting thing about that claim or rumor. What if there were another civil war in that nation? What if those politicians and military men were not told about that war to the people, and then nobody even knew about this internal conflict. This theory or story have been told to explain the time of the wild west, and maybe some parts of this story are true. But in the modern time is claiming that some internal groups of USA would want to begin the civil war, and then somebody got an idea, that why people should know about that kind of things? The only information, what is needed is, that somewhere is an armed person, who might be dangerous. This is the only information, what the law enforcement must know when they come to make arrests.
If somebody would serve in the some "shotgun company" in the middle west, why that person would not treat as the normal criminal? Why should every people know about that kind of persons political interests? When we are talking about terrorism, we are facing the fact, that why people should know about that organization? If the terrorist group is well known, it has more easy to recruit people, and here we are facing the question, what if the British have not mentioned IRA? Or newspapers would not be mentioned about the rebel of General Lee? And why that person's military rank mentioned? Why didn't they make that person the normal leader of the outlaw gang?
What if newspapers would not tell, that Lee had some political purposes, and if that man would be mentioned as the normal outlaw, who robbed banks or something? Would somebody join that rebel team? And if the IRA would not ever be mentioned, would anybody even know about that organization? This is the key in the stories about "The second civil war". If nobody ever knows about the rebellions, they would not join that force too easily. And maybe press have been censored the political aspects of the outlaw's actions in the Wild West in the 1880's? Who knows the truth?
Kimmo Huosionmaa
So here is the time for some conspiracy stuff, and I decided to make this writing about the "second civil war in the USA". The civil war of the USA in 1861 to 1865 cost over 300 000 casualties and that war was one of the bloodiest in the history of that nation. Today we are concerning the freedom and our privacy, and we have almost forgotten one quite interesting idea of the civil war. When the Union won the war in 1860's there were claiming, that the Southern side of Confederate would try to make relevance in sometimes after the civil war.
And here is the very interesting thing about that claim or rumor. What if there were another civil war in that nation? What if those politicians and military men were not told about that war to the people, and then nobody even knew about this internal conflict. This theory or story have been told to explain the time of the wild west, and maybe some parts of this story are true. But in the modern time is claiming that some internal groups of USA would want to begin the civil war, and then somebody got an idea, that why people should know about that kind of things? The only information, what is needed is, that somewhere is an armed person, who might be dangerous. This is the only information, what the law enforcement must know when they come to make arrests.
If somebody would serve in the some "shotgun company" in the middle west, why that person would not treat as the normal criminal? Why should every people know about that kind of persons political interests? When we are talking about terrorism, we are facing the fact, that why people should know about that organization? If the terrorist group is well known, it has more easy to recruit people, and here we are facing the question, what if the British have not mentioned IRA? Or newspapers would not be mentioned about the rebel of General Lee? And why that person's military rank mentioned? Why didn't they make that person the normal leader of the outlaw gang?
What if newspapers would not tell, that Lee had some political purposes, and if that man would be mentioned as the normal outlaw, who robbed banks or something? Would somebody join that rebel team? And if the IRA would not ever be mentioned, would anybody even know about that organization? This is the key in the stories about "The second civil war". If nobody ever knows about the rebellions, they would not join that force too easily. And maybe press have been censored the political aspects of the outlaw's actions in the Wild West in the 1880's? Who knows the truth?
Comments
Post a Comment