Kimmo Huosionmaa
The problems with giving comments for blogs is that we all have right for our opinions, and this makes giving opinions quite difficult. When we are giving comments for another person writings, we must say, that there is one thing, what we must avoid. That is saying that somebody has the worse opinion than somebody else has. And even if somebody writes something stupid, would that happen because the writer has different opinions than some readers. We all have a different kind of interests every person in the world are not interested in Henry Kissinger, and what kind of actor this person was in the foreign policy of the USA.
But same way everybody is not interested in ice-hockey. And when we are thinking about opinions, we must ask one very important question: do you have right to share your opinions with other persons, who surround you, and be sure that nobody laughs at you? When we are thinking about some gangs, we must see that they are like military organizations. Then somebody says something, what is against the opinion of the gang leader, would that cause the thing, that this person, who said something, that doesn't please the leader of the gang, would not travel to next ice-hockey world championships with that person.
This is everything in the membership of some gangs. There is the absolute strict dress code, what means that those persons must also be fans of some particular ice-hockey teams, and if those persons would not have some particular opinions about those teams, would that cause kicks off the gang. This is problematic for giving comments for something, where would we not handle ice-hockey. When some person writes about asteroids and another civilization, there are no absolute right answers for those things like wormholes and alien civilizations. Science or art is not an ice-hockey game, where the better team makes more goals than another. This makes comments for some blogs quite difficult.
There would be not straight and scientifically proven absolute truth about those things, and if you want to argue with some philosopher, would that man or woman turn the expected distance of alien civilization enough big, that the radio signals would not be in that distance before this philosopher would die. And this means that nobody can hurt dead philosopher. This means that this man would not care anything if this person would be rest in the grave. People would not get anger anything, what they hear or see.
And this is the reason why around some military leaders were playing music because those military leaders like Albrecht Von Wallenstein surrounded themselves with musicians, because of this makes sure that any bad world in the conquerer city would not get in the ear of Wallenstein, what could cause that half of city could be executed. And the purpose of that music was to make that general unable to hear anything that was meant for that general.
Nobody wants to hear bad feedback about their writings. That means that if somebody gives bad feedback, would that person go to the first time want to close the blog because the feedback was not, what writer wants that be. We all want to get good feedback, but at the same time, we must know, that somebody might not want to see our writings in the same way, as the writer sees it. And that would cause conflicts between those persons. Maybe somebody would have the right opinion, but there are always people, who believe that they are better than another. And that might cause conflicts between those actors.
The biggest threat to dictators are people, who have the ability to think by using own brains. They can always ask real questions about the leadership. And one of the best is, that "why dictators must always rule rest of their life" second one would be that "who says that this particular leader is better than others. It would be nice to hear that thing from some dictator. That person might think that is "cool" to control everything in their political system, but as we might think, there would be very difficult to explain the dictatorial way to use police and army in those countries. And would it be nice to send political enemies to the concentration camps? Does it feel nice? And those things are very complicated for answering.But why that man believe, that he is an only good change to his nation? This is the questions, what would be nice to ask some hardcore dictators in the world, who rule their countries by iron touch.
Comments
Post a Comment