How the Internet-observations officer chooses the individual, who is put under surveillance?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many people are thinking, that it is safe to avoid the hotel's WiFi networks because the operators can catch the data from the WiFi, but they are entirely wrong in this case. The reason why those persons are wrong is that if they don't use the free Internet, there might be something to hide with those people because they don't use that WLAN even with big laptops, and this makes the observers curious. They are looking for people, who use sophisticated and robust network security when that will compile in the things what they do on the Internet.


The situation, when the safety makes person suspected data criminal is like using the enterprise-level security solutions in-home network, and of course, if those solutions are expensive, could that cause that the interest of put this person under surveillance will grow extremely high. Those surveillance operators will not use only one method to break the privacy of the targeted person, and those operators use normally also telescopes, binoculars and small remote control helicopters in their missions. But the massive number of data will go thru the Internet Sockets all the time.


But somebody will know, that exception to the normal behavior will be noticed by the surveillance team. If some person normally uses credit-cards for paying, but suddenly will that same person starts to use cash, will that cause the reaction in the surveillance screens. And the reason for the change of behavior must be found. Another way to make the surveillance team very interested in avoiding some services.


One of the misunderstandings is just avoiding the franchise hotels, what belong to some ring. In the small independent hotels have the smaller number of information in those databases and the operators must just check the data.  If there were many more users, the data storage will be so large, that the systematical check of that information would be very long action. But in the big and small systems is small differences. Then somebody wants to keep the name as the secret, will this person choose small size system, where the "surface data" flow only in the hands of the small group.


But in the small system, the deep scanning of data will be possible and give more effective information for surveillance operators who work in this kind of system. In big systems, many operators will see "surface data" of the users, but deeper analyze of information will be difficult because there is the larger number of bytes and there are many same-ranked officers who are watching the system. In small system might have only one high-school trained operator or maybe that service is produced by some other actor. This allows those men to work alone without afraid that somebody even sees what is going on.

Picture 1

http://www.sifytechnologies.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/datacenterhosting_managedservice_taxialways_fod.jpg

https://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-internet-observations-officer.html