"Unlike the picture that Newton had of instantaneous forces along the line-of-sight connecting any two masses, Einstein conceived gravity as a warped spacetime fabric, where the individual particles moved through that curved space according to the predictions of general relativity. In Einstein’s picture, gravity is not instantaneous at all, but instead must propagate at a limited speed: the speed of gravity, which is identical to the speed of light." (BigThink, Einstein’s big insight that explained Newton’s law of gravity)
When we think of the gravity pool, Albert Einstein's wonderful idea about the universe or spacetime curvature around particles. That thing means that all particles and mass centers are in the pothole. That pothole means that energy disappears at that point. And the fact is this: energy doesn't vanish. Particle pulls energy into itself.
During that process, an electromagnetic field tries to fill that pothole. That electromagnetic- or Higgs field just takes particles and wave movement with it, when it tries to fill that pothole. If we use a 2D model that thing is quite easy to explain. The layer is the quantum field where the particle hovers. And particles seem to suck some of the field into it.
Otherwise, we can think that The quantum field would be like the atmosphere. The top of the particle is at a lower energy area. That makes energy travel from the field below the particle to the top of it. But it's hard to turn this model into the 3D universe. The asymmetry in the pothole makes particles move.
The fact is that when some structure is proven. It's not unknown anymore. The thing is that there might be many still unknown particles. Another point is that we don't know how many particles or phenomena like quasiparticles are still waiting for their finders. Suppose things like superstring theories are right. The question is what makes those superstrings form particles like leptons and quarks?
Another interesting thought is this: can there be some kind of quasiparticle that forms in the superstring interaction? In some models, there is a lot of negative energy, that can released in the particles. In some models, negative energy is the energy void, or energy vacuum in the particles. The outside energy field pulls particles from the outside. And if the particle's shell will give in, the energy impacts like it makes in vacuum bombs. So, that phenomenon just collects energy around the particle, and then it releases that packed energy.
The quarks and leptons are the most well-known particles in the particle group called fermions. And then the bosons are the transmitter particles. That transmits four fundamental forces. Then there are theories about the chameleon bosons, the particles that can be fermion and boson. But we cannot find those particles. Because, they are too short to live.
The size of those particles like Higgs boson is very small, and their energy level is very high. They send energy quantum very fast. And that makes it hard to detect such high-energy particles.
When the ultimate particle sends energy quantum, its existence as an ultimate particle ends. When that kind of particle sends energy quantum, it transforms into some other particle. The thing is that time shows what secrets material and its interactions involve.
https://bigthink.com/hard-science/standard-model-quarks-leptons/
https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/einstein-insight-newton-law-gravity/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy
Comments
Post a Comment